MaxClover

The MaxClover experiment ran from 2002 to 2011. A photo diary is now available for viewing/download (117 pp; PDF 18.3 MB). This diary documents the changes in pasture composition over time. A written commentary is included to describe the changes observed. Additionally, a full list of scientific publications, with links where available, is listed at the bottom of the page.

The ‘MaxClover’ Grazing Experiment was established at Lincoln University in autumn 2002. This long-term replicated experiment ran for 10 years and allowed dry matter and sheep liveweight production to be measured for nine full growth seasons.

Supplementary Material | People | Scientific papers | Downloads

There were six different pastures evaluated with one of the main aims being to identify a legume which could complete and survive within cocksfoot (orchardgrass) based pastures in dryland environments which experienced periodic water stress. Four of the pastures were cocksfoot (CF) based sown in a mix with either subterranean (CF/Sub), balansa (CF/Bal), white (CF/Wc) or Caucasian (CF/Cc) clovers. The Sub and balansa clovers were annuals and the white and Caucasian clovers were perennials which allowed the Lincoln University Dryland Research team to look at how resource demand could be offset within a mixture to reduce competition between the grass and clover for water, light and nutrients. These cocksfoot based pastures were compared with a perennial ryegrass/white clover control (RG/Wc) and a lucerne (Luc) monoculture.

^ Back to Top ^

Figure 1 reports total and seasonal LWt production from Coopworth sheep which grazed the pastures.

Figure 1 Seasonal liveweight (LW) production from six dryland pastures for eight growth seasons at Lincoln University Canterbury. Green bars are spring, orange bars are summer and blue bars are autumn/winter.
Figure 1 Seasonal liveweight (LW) production from six dryland pastures for eight growth seasons at Lincoln University Canterbury. Green bars are spring, orange bars are summer and blue bars are autumn/winter.

^ Back to Top ^

Figure 2 shows accumulated total dry matter (TDM) production of the six pastures over the nine growth seasons, and total rainfall in each growth season – error bars are SEM for TDM. Most years lucerne yields were superior to all grass based pastures. Production from CF/Sub pastures was generally similar to or greater than all other grass-based pastures and yields from the annual Sub clover accounted for 25-32% of total annual yield in six of the nine years with yields of 2.4-3.8 t/ha Sub clover in those years.

Figure 2 Total annual dry matter (DM) production (t DM/ha/yr) of six dryland pastures grazed by sheep at Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand over nine growth seasons. Error bar is the SEM. Numbers in bold are yield and annual rainfall (mm) is each growth season is reported below the error bars.
Figure 2 Total annual dry matter (DM) production (t DM/ha/yr) of six dryland pastures grazed by sheep at Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand over nine growth seasons. Error bar is the SEM. Numbers in bold are yield and annual rainfall (mm) is each growth season is reported below the error bars.

By the final year the sown grass and clovers accounted for about 65% of total yield in the cocksfoot based pastures compared with only 13% from the ryegrass and white clover in the control pasture. White clover content in the CF/Wc pasture was 25% in the first year and decreased to 3% in the last year.

^ Back to Top ^

^ Back to Research Projects ^

Supplementary material associated with scientific publications

The following soil test data (Table 1) is supplementary material associated with the following publication: Mills A, Moot DJ, Lucas RJ. 2014a. ‘MaxClover’ Grazing Experiment: I. Annual yields, botanical composition and growth rates of six dryland pastures over nine years. Grass and Forage Science, 70, 557-570.

Table 1 Soil test results (0-75 mm) from the MaxClover Grazing Experiment at Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand for nine growth seasons. Soil samples were analysed using Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Quicktest (MAF QT) procedures. 

 pHOlsen PCa2+Mg2+K+Na+SO4S
DatePasture(H2O)(µg/ml)meq/100 g meq/100 g meq/100 g meq/100 g (µg/ml)
30/01/2002Pre-Sow5.714516673
11/06/2003CF/Sub5.9147159712
CF/Bal6.0117149710
CF/Wc6.01371610714
CF/Cc6.01471610712
RG/Wc6.1147169710
Luc5.81371610617
24/06/2004CF/Sub6.0157161388
CF/Bal6.01261510911
CF/Wc6.2137161187
CF/Cc6.213718988
RG/Wc6.21181610811
Luc6.01661713818
28/04/2005CF/Sub6.2157141396
CF/Bal6.1156151366
CF/Wc6.2157161063
CF/Cc6.2156151163
RG/Wc6.2137151155
Luc6.0186141569
28/04/2006CF/Sub6.2198161349
CF/Bal6.21871613912
CF/Wc6.22061612914
CF/Cc6.22371713913
RG/Wc6.2157169911
Luc6.02161415924
26/07/2007CF/Sub6.4229171973
CF/Bal6.41781913103
 CF/Wc6.4228181683
CF/Cc6.4249201793
 RG/Wc6.42592018103
Luc6.52792217103
07/05/2008CF/Sub6.224821151210
CF/Bal6.4248201597
 CF/Wc6.32082015107
CF/Cc6.32282115117
RG/Wc6.318820121211
Luc6.22581917817
12/05/2009CF/Sub6.318821157
CF/Bal6.217819145
CF/Wc6.319920146
CF/Cc6.322720146
RG/Wc6.314819116
Luc6.319818174
11/06/2010CF/Sub6.1268221574
CF/Bal6.1258201443
 CF/Wc6.2268201353
CF/Cc6.1268211453
RG/Wc6.1207181054
Luc6.1258181845

^ Back to Top ^

^ Back to Research Projects ^

The following graze days and liveweight data is supplementary material associated with the following publication:

Mills A, Lucas RJ, Moot DJ. 2014b. ‘MaxClover’ Grazing Experiment. II. Sheep liveweight production from six grazed dryland pastures over eight years. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 58, 57-77.

Please see the publication for relevant information on the timing and class of stock grazing to aid interpretation. The difference between total grazing days (Table 2) and ‘Production’ grazing days (Table 3) represents grazing events associated with pasture management where sheep grazed at high stocking rates for short durations to clean up pastures. During these times liveweight gain was assumed to be zero.

Table 2 Total annual grazing days per hectare from “production” and “maintenance” stock classes grazing six dryland pastures at Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand over nine growth seasons.

Pasture02/0303/0404/0505/0606/0707/0808/0909/1010/11
CF/Sub73215637 bc6727 abc7081 a8420 ab6804 ab5953 a7549 a
CF/Bal87426329 a8247 a6967 a9298 a6359 bc5184 bc6275 b
CF/Wc78625795 ab7706 ab6499 a8320 ab6659 ab5128 bc6516 b
CF/Cc76695419 bc6912 abc6744 a9198 a7193 a5488 ab7452 a
RG/Wc68545121 cd6344 bc5324 b8180 b5870 cd4670 c5904 b
Luc46844772 d5557 c4593 b6190 c5316 d5317 b5990 b
Mean5512691662018286636752906614
SEM198.8544.8256.7340.3226.9208.2265.0
Significance******************
Note: each grazing day is per animal and is unadjusted for stock class or LWt (i.e. stock units have not been standardised and 1 ewe plus twin lambs grazing for one day is 3 GD). Significance levels are: ns=not significant; * =P<0.05; ** =P<0.001 and ***=P<0.001. Within columns values followed by the same letter are similar at P<0.05. In Year 1 (2002/03) liveweight was not determined and grazing days includes pre-fencing periods when pastures were grazed in common so data could not be analysed. All GD in 2010/11 were associated with LWt production periods and no maintenance grazing events occurred. Within columns values followed by the same letter are similar at the ɑ = 0.05 level.

^ Back to Top ^

^ Back to Research Projects ^

Table 3 ‘Production’ graze days/ha for sheep grazing the ‘MaxClover’ grazing experiment at Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand. ‘Production’ graze days were not recorded in 2002/03 (Year 1). In spring of 2009/10 (Year 8) and 2010/11 (Year 9) grazing days were for ewes with twin lambs at foot in spring.

Pasture02/0303/0404/0505/0606/0707/0808/0909/1010/11
CF/Sub5119 ab63096026 a56475425 a56926657 a6652 a
CF/Bal4075 c56216114 a48335130 abc49245333 bc5206 b
CF/Wc5282 a68245702 a55275275 ab48295506 bc5146 b
CF/Cc4932 ab62146034 a59265512 a48296096 b5493 b
RG/Wc4865 ab56294579 b49754561 c45615012 c4360 c
Luc4772 b50893785 c52714768 bc51205643 bc5263 b
Mean48415948537353835112505156665353
SEM159.3453.6221.7287.4201.9286.3247.0234.8
Significance **ns***ns*ns*****
Note: each grazing day is per animal and is unadjusted for stock class or LWt (i.e. stock units have not been standardised and 1 ewe plus twin lambs grazing for one day is 3 GD). Significance levels are: ns=not significant; * =P<0.05; ** =P<0.001 and *** =P<0.001. In Year 1 (2002/03) liveweight was not determined and grazing days includes pre-fencing periods when pastures were grazed in common so data could not be analysed. All GD in 2010/11 were associated with LWt production periods and no maintenance grazing events occurred. Within columns values followed by the same letter are similar.

^ Back to Top ^

^ Back to Research Projects ^

Table 4 Fractional distribution of grazing days on six dryland pastures at Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand over nine growth seasons.

  Year
SeasonPasture02/0303/0404/0505/0606/0707/0808/0909/1010/11
SpringCF/Sub0.56 bc0.770.71 ab0.68 a0.66 a0.74 a0.850.67 a
CF/Bal0.74 a0.530.69 b0.52 b0.67 a0.65 b0.760.64 a
 CF/Wc0.57 bc0.640.66 b0.700.72 a0.67 b0.750.68 a
CF/Cc0.56 bc0.580.66 b0.72 a0.67 a0.64 bc0.750.68 a
RG/Wc0.60 b0.680.76 a0.69 a0.67 a0.70 ab0.790.69 a
Luc0.52 c0.620.57 c0.47 b0.48 b0.58 c0.740.54 b
Mean 0.590.640.670.630.640.660.770.64
SEM 0.210.720.210.270.300.0220.0260.022
Significance ***ns************ns***
           
SummerCF/Sub0.28 ab0.280.12 cd0.27 b0.17 bc0.10 c0.08 b0.10 c
CF/Bal0.00 e0.560.12 c0.40 a0.19 b0.17 b0.18 a0.17 b
CF/Wc0.24 bc0.290.18 b0.29 b0.09 c0.16 b0.19 a0.18 b
CF/Cc0.33 a0.350.16 bc0.25 b0.15 bc0.17 b0.18 a0.14 bc
RG/Wc0.22 c0.270.06 d0.29 b0.16 bc0.10 c0.16 a0.18 b
Luc0.09 d0.360.33 a0.44 a0.35 a0.29 a0.18 a0.33 a
Mean 0.190.350.160.320.180.170.160.19
 SEM 0.18ns0.200.300.0320.0150.0250.016
Significance ***0.076****************
           
AutumnCF/Sub0.16 c0.06 c0.17 ab0.05 ab0.170.16 ab0.07 ab0.23 a
 CF/Bal0.26 b-0.09 d0.20 a0.08 a0.140.18 a0.06 bc0.19 ab
 CF/Wc0.19 c0.07 a0.15 b0.01 c0.200.18 a0.07 ab0.17 bc
 CF/Cc0.12 d0.07 a0.18 a0.03 bc0.180.19 a0.07 ab0.18 b
 RG/Wc0.18 c0.05 a0.18 ab0.03 bc0.170.20 a0.05 c0.13 d
 Luc0.39 a0.01 b0.11 c0.08 a0.170.13 b0.08 a0.13 cd
 Mean 0.220.0050.180.050.170.170.070.17
 SEM 0.0100.0100.0110.0110.0220.0150.0060.015
 Significance ************ns*****
Note: Values may not sum due to rounding. Significance levels are: ns = non-significant, * = P<0.05, ** =P<0.01 and *** = P<0.001. SEM is the standard error of the mean. Numbers followed by the same letter are similar at the P<0.05 level. In 2002/03 liveweight was not determined (-). Negative values indicate animals lost liveweight gained in previous grazing periods.

^ Back to Top ^

^ Back to Research Projects ^

Figure 3 Average liveweight (LWt/hd) of the “core” animal groups grazing one of six dryland pastures over eight years at Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand. The stock classes are: hoggets (○) and weaned lambs (▽) weighed empty or ewes (●) with twin lambs at foot (▼) weighed full. Breaks indicate either a change in the class of stock, a period when the pastures were destocked or when the number of animals in the “core” group changed which altered the average weight of the mob.

^ Back to Top ^

^ Back to Research Projects ^

Average stocking rates

A ‘put and take’ system matched feed supply to animal demand. the graph below shows the average stocking rates for different seaons and stock classes grazing the pastures.

Figure 4 Mean stocking rate (head/ha) of ewe hoggets (●,○), weaned lambs (■,□,■) and ewes (▼,▽) with lambs at foot (◆,◇) during liveweight production periods in Spring (Jul-Nov; black symbols), Summer (Dec-Feb; white fill) and Autumn (Mar-Jun; grey fill) grazing one of six dryland pastures over eight years at Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.

^ Back to Top ^

^ Back to Research Projects ^

Researchers

Students

  • Clayton Buckley (B.Ag.Sci Honours)
  • Janelle Sangster-Ward (B.Ag.Sci Honours)
  • Annamaria Mills (PhD)
  • Nop Tonmukayakul (M.Ag.Sci.)
  • Nicole Morris (M.Ag.Sci.)
  • Dave Monks (PhD)
  • Serkan Ates (PhD)

Publications

^ Back to Top ^

^ Back to Research Projects ^

Downloads